<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Rationalizing risk aversion in science · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.13816/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.13816/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Rationalizing risk aversion in science — mentioned by a_bonobo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36557136</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2306.13816:36557136</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2023 01:08:54 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Somewhat related, Kevin Gross and Carl T Bergstrom just put up this preprint on risk aversion in science: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.13816 &amp;gt; incentives to motivate effort clash with incentives to motivate risk-taking, because a failed project may be evidence of a risky undertaking but could also be the result of simple sloth. As a result, the incentives needed to encourage effort actively discourage risk-taking. Scientists respond by working on safe projects that generate evidence of effort but that don&amp;#x27;t move science forward as rapidly as riskier projects would.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.13816/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.soc-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
