<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Harnessing the Power of Adversarial Prompting and Large Language Models for Robust Hypothesis Generation in Astronomy · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.11648/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.11648/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Harnessing the Power of Adversarial Prompting and Large Language Models for Robust Hypothesis Generation in Astronomy — mentioned by jwuphysics</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37525276</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2306.11648:37525276</guid><pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 16:11:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; The idea that AI might transform scientific practice is therefore feasible. But the main barrier is sociological: it can happen only if human scientists are willing and able to use such tools. As a tenure-track scientist who works in ML applications for astrophysics, I disagree with this sentiment. The main issue isn&amp;#x27;t that enough scientists are using tools to search through literature or form new hypotheses, the main issue is that scientists now have to validate and sift through AI-generated outputs in order to find useful signals, rather than validate and sift through experimentally…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.11648/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.IM</category></item></channel></rss>
