<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Comment on "Gravitational Pair Production and Black Hole Evaporation" · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.07628/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.07628/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Comment on "Gravitational Pair Production and Black Hole Evaporation" — mentioned by A_D_E_P_T</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43964524</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2306.07628:43964524</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 16:03:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s nonsense. See this comment on their previous paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.07628 The authors of the comment show that the &amp;quot;gravitational pair-production&amp;quot; rate used in the work in OP comes from truncating the covariant heat-kernel (proper-time) expansion of the one-loop effective action at second order in curvature, an approximation that is valid only in weak-field regions where all curvature invariants satisfy |R| · ℓ² ≪ 1 (where ℓ is the Compton wavelength). When that same expression is pushed into the high-curvature interior of a neutron star -- where the inequalities fail by many…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2306.07628/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
