HackerPapers

arXiv:2306.00915q-bio.NC

The feasibility of artificial consciousness through the lens of neuroscience

Jaan Aru, Matthew Larkum, James M. Shine

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Interactions with large language models have led to the suggestion that these models may soon be conscious. From the perspective of neuroscience, this position is difficult to defend. For one, the inputs to large language models lack the embodied, embedded information content characteristic of our sensory contact with the world around us. Secondly, the architecture of large language models is missing key features of the thalamocortical system that have been linked to conscious awareness in mammals. Finally, the evolutionary and developmental trajectories that led to the emergence of living conscious organisms arguably have no parallels in artificial systems as envisioned today. The existence of living organisms depends on their actions, and their survival is intricately linked to multi-level cellular, inter-cellular, and organismal processes culminating in agency and consciousness.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
q-bio.NCNeurons and Cognition cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.LGMachine Learning cs.RORobotics

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 2 HN submissions from Jun 2023 to Jun 2023. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.