HackerPapers

arXiv:2305.20010cs.AI

Human or Not? A Gamified Approach to the Turing Test

Daniel Jannai, Amos Meron, Barak Lenz, Yoav Levine, Yoav Shoham

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We present "Human or Not?", an online game inspired by the Turing test, that measures the capability of AI chatbots to mimic humans in dialog, and of humans to tell bots from other humans. Over the course of a month, the game was played by over 1.5 million users who engaged in anonymous two-minute chat sessions with either another human or an AI language model which was prompted to behave like humans. The task of the players was to correctly guess whether they spoke to a person or to an AI. This largest scale Turing-style test conducted to date revealed some interesting facts. For example, overall users guessed the identity of their partners correctly in only 68% of the games. In the subset of the games in which users faced an AI bot, users had even lower correct guess rates of 60% (that is, not much higher than chance). This white paper details the development, deployment, and results of this unique experiment. While this experiment calls for many extensions and refinements, these findings already begin to shed light on the inevitable near future which will commingle humans and AI.

arXiv comments
11 pages, 6 figures
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.CLComputation and Language cs.CYComputers and Society cs.HCHuman-Computer Interaction

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 3 HN submissions from Jun 2023 to Jun 2023. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.