<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Abductive Commonsense Reasoning Exploiting Mutually Exclusive Explanations · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.14618/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.14618/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Abductive Commonsense Reasoning Exploiting Mutually Exclusive Explanations — mentioned by sitkack</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42906908</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2305.14618:42906908</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2025 07:41:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;My comment got eaten by HN, but I think LLMs should be used as the glue between logic systems like prolog, with inductive, deductive and abductive reasoning being handed off to a tool. LLMs are great at pattern matching, but forcing them to reason seems like an out of envelope use. Prolog would be how I would solve puzzles like that as well. It is like calling someone weak for using a spreadsheet or a calculator. Abductive Commonsense Reasoning Exploiting Mutually Exclusive Explanations https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14618&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.14618/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
