<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Getting ViT in Shape: Scaling Laws for Compute-Optimal Model Design · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.13035/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.13035/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Getting ViT in Shape: Scaling Laws for Compute-Optimal Model Design — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36189137</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2305.13035:36189137</guid><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2023 20:11:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#x27;s been an existential issue I&amp;#x27;ve seen with publishing, concerning this (same/related issues to the article). There&amp;#x27;s models and datasets that are closed and being published in works. Here&amp;#x27;s an example[0]. ICLR states &amp;gt; Submissions will be double blind: reviewers cannot see author names when conducting reviews, and authors cannot see reviewer names. This means that the submission must not contain acknowledgements or any link (e.g., github) that would reveal authors’ identity. While Chinchila certainly is not a github link it is an acknowledgement that reveals the lab identity. Which…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.13035/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
