<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Machine-Made Media: Monitoring the Mobilization of Machine-Generated Articles on Misinformation and Mainstream News Websites · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.09820/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.09820/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Machine-Made Media: Monitoring the Mobilization of Machine-Generated Articles on Misinformation and Mainstream News Websites — mentioned by ttctciyf</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37713542</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2305.09820:37713542</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2023 08:07:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I was curious to see specifics of what the authors consider fake news sources. I didn&amp;#x27;t see any concrete identification in the paper itself, but following one of the references[1] I found this: &amp;gt; Within our list of news sites, we differentiate between “unreliable news websites” and “reliable news websites.” Our list of unreliable news websites includes 1,142 domains labeled as conspiracy/pseudoscience” by mediabiasfactcheck.com as well as those labeled as “unreliable news”, misinformation, or disinformation by prior work (Hanley, Kumar, and Durumeric 2023; Barret Golding 2022; Szpakowski…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.09820/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
