HackerPapers

arXiv:2305.09799cs.CR

Poster: No safety in numbers: traffic analysis of sealed-sender groups in Signal

Eric Brigham, Nicholas Hopper

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Secure messaging applications often offer privacy to users by protecting their messages from would be observers through end-to-end encryption techniques. However, the metadata of who communicates with whom cannot be concealed by encryption alone. Signal's Sealed Sender mechanism attempts to enhance its protection of this data by obfuscating the sender of any message sent with the protocol. However, it was shown by Martiny et al. that due to the message delivery protocols in Signal, the record of who receives messages can be enough to recover this metadata. In this work we extend the attack presented from deanonymizing communicating pairs to deanonymizing entire group conversations.

arXiv comments
2 page abstract for poster session at 44th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CRCryptography and Security

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Aug 2024 to Aug 2024. Found in 1 HN submission from Feb 2024 to Feb 2024. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. XMPP vs. Matrix 1 comment
    • https://simplex.chat/ has lesser metadata than Signal[1][2], Matrix and XMPP. SimpleX Chat is going to move to Groups V2[3] very soon to make the experience much better. [1]: https://www.ndss-symposium.org/ndss-paper/improving-signals-... [2]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.09799…

      ementallyView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.