<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Case for CXL-Centric Server Processors · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.05033/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.05033/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Case for CXL-Centric Server Processors — mentioned by anonymousDan</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39934531</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2305.05033:39934531</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 19:06:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;ve seen some very recent research proposing just that: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.05033.pdf . Of course still far from production, but interesting that in some cases it actually also improves latency.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.05033/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AR</category></item></channel></rss>
