<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Breakdown of the Newton-Einstein Standard Gravity at Low Acceleration in Internal Dynamics of Wide Binary Stars · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.04613/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.04613/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Breakdown of the Newton-Einstein Standard Gravity at Low Acceleration in Internal Dynamics of Wide Binary Stars — mentioned by negativelambda</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38173755</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2305.04613:38173755</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 06:07:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Based on these papers: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.10404 https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.04613&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.04613/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item><item><title>Breakdown of the Newton-Einstein Standard Gravity at Low Acceleration in Internal Dynamics of Wide Binary Stars — mentioned by floxy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37069480</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2305.04613:37069480</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 22:54:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like it is probably this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.04613&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.04613/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item><item><title>Breakdown of the Newton-Einstein Standard Gravity at Low Acceleration in Internal Dynamics of Wide Binary Stars — mentioned by nh23423fefe</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37054132</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2305.04613:37054132</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 19:18:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;As a layman, I can&amp;#x27;t follow, but the paper [1] references AQUAL [2] &amp;quot;This systematic deviation agrees with the boost factor that the AQUAL theory predicts.&amp;quot; But that theory doesn&amp;#x27;t agree with observation? And I&amp;#x27;ll paraphrase Sean Carroll [3] as saying something like Scalar-vector-tensor theories are just dark matter theories in disguise. Positing an noninteracting energy density, is just positing dark matter. 1 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.04613.pdf 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AQUAL#:~:text=AQUAL%27s%20fail... 3 https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2023/07/31/245-...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.04613/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item></channel></rss>
