<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.04091/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.04091/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41135921</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2305.04091:41135921</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 03:40:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Ask HN: Research Papers on Prompt Engineering?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since prompting is such an important topic, I&amp;#x27;m looking for a list of papers on how to improve prompts (around a year old, but preferably less). So far, I&amp;#x27;ve found two: - &amp;quot;Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models&amp;quot; (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.04091v3) - &amp;quot;Accessing GPT-4 Level Mathematical Olympiad Solutions via Monte Carlo Tree Self-refine with LLaMa-3 8B: A Technical Report&amp;quot; (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.07394v2) Do you recommend any other papers?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 2 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.04091/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models — mentioned by fragsworth</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35994552</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2305.04091:35994552</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2023 21:47:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; furthermore there planning abilities are non-existent. Have you even tried to ask it to plan things out? It can plan things out. In fact, just asking it to plan things out has shown significant benchmark improvements for general questions: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.04091.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2305.04091/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
