HackerPapers

arXiv:2305.02705cs.RO

Guidance & Control Networks for Time-Optimal Quadcopter Flight

Sebastien Origer, Christophe De Wagter, Robin Ferede, Guido C. H. E. de Croon, Dario Izzo

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Reaching fast and autonomous flight requires computationally efficient and robust algorithms. To this end, we train Guidance & Control Networks to approximate optimal control policies ranging from energy-optimal to time-optimal flight. We show that the policies become more difficult to learn the closer we get to the time-optimal 'bang-bang' control profile. We also assess the importance of knowing the maximum angular rotor velocity of the quadcopter and show that over- or underestimating this limit leads to less robust flight. We propose an algorithm to identify the current maximum angular rotor velocity onboard and a network that adapts its policy based on the identified limit. Finally, we extend previous work on Guidance & Control Networks by learning to take consecutive waypoints into account. We fly a 4x3m track in similar lap times as the differential-flatness-based minimum snap benchmark controller while benefiting from the flexibility that Guidance & Control Networks offer.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.RORobotics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Aug 2025 to Aug 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • The last time I was reminded of the bitter lesson was when I read about Guidance & Control Networks, after seeing them used in an autonomous drone that beat the best human FPV pilots [0]. Basically it's using a small MLP (Multi Layer Perceptron) on the order of 200 parameters…

      sorenjanView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.