HackerPapers

arXiv:2304.14767cs.CL

Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Models

Mor Geva, Jasmijn Bastings, Katja Filippova, Amir Globerson

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Transformer-based language models (LMs) are known to capture factual knowledge in their parameters. While previous work looked into where factual associations are stored, only little is known about how they are retrieved internally during inference. We investigate this question through the lens of information flow. Given a subject-relation query, we study how the model aggregates information about the subject and relation to predict the correct attribute. With interventions on attention edges, we first identify two critical points where information propagates to the prediction: one from the relation positions followed by another from the subject positions. Next, by analyzing the information at these points, we unveil a three-step internal mechanism for attribute extraction. First, the representation at the last-subject position goes through an enrichment process, driven by the early MLP sublayers, to encode many subject-related attributes. Second, information from the relation propagates to the prediction. Third, the prediction representation "queries" the enriched subject to extract the attribute. Perhaps surprisingly, this extraction is typically done via attention heads, which often encode subject-attribute mappings in their parameters. Overall, our findings introduce a comprehensive view of how factual associations are stored and extracted internally in LMs, facilitating future research on knowledge localization and editing.

arXiv comments
Accepted at EMNLP 2023
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Nov 2023 to Nov 2023. Found in 2 HN submissions from May 2023 to May 2023. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • This post isn't a scientific investigation. It's someone playing around with a black-box model with few to little controls – which is unfortunately the only thing we can do when experimenting with GPT-4, which does excuse this partially. Unfortunately, though, the author seems…

      numeriView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.