<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Solving 2-MAXSAT in Polynomial Time: a Proof of $\textit{P}$ = $\textit{NP}$ · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2304.12517/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2304.12517/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Solving 2-MAXSAT in Polynomial Time: a Proof of $\textit{P}$ = $\textit{NP}$ — mentioned by dvdkhlng</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35729406</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2304.12517:35729406</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 15:16:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I already have problems following Proposition 1 where they introduce a different DNF with twice the clauses of the original CNF than claim that maximizing the satisfied clauses in the DNF would also yield a maximum satisfied solution for the CNF. It&amp;#x27;s a pitty they don&amp;#x27;t release any source code that we can unit-test against problems with known solutions (while also profiling run-time to stay within polynomial bounds) :) edit: what am I missing, their reduction to a DNF seems unsuitable to me? I read proposition 1 [1] to mean: they find an optimal solution for the DNF V∪X, then expect the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2304.12517/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CC</category></item><item><title>Solving 2-MAXSAT in Polynomial Time: a Proof of $\textit{P}$ = $\textit{NP}$ — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35726855</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2304.12517:35726855</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:11:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The 2-MAXSAT Problem Can Be Solved in Polynomial Time&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;61 points; 102 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2304.12517/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CC</category></item><item><title>Solving 2-MAXSAT in Polynomial Time: a Proof of $\textit{P}$ = $\textit{NP}$ — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35712326</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2304.12517:35712326</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 12:01:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The 2-Maxsat Problem Can Be Solved in Polynomial Time&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6 points; 5 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2304.12517/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CC</category></item></channel></rss>
