HackerPapers

arXiv:2304.09871cs.LG

A Theory on Adam Instability in Large-Scale Machine Learning

Igor Molybog, Peter Albert, Moya Chen, Zachary DeVito, David Esiobu, Naman Goyal, Punit Singh Koura, Sharan Narang, Andrew Poulton, Ruan Silva, Binh Tang, Diana Liskovich, Puxin Xu, Yuchen Zhang, Melanie Kambadur, Stephen Roller, Susan Zhang

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We present a theory for the previously unexplained divergent behavior noticed in the training of large language models. We argue that the phenomenon is an artifact of the dominant optimization algorithm used for training, called Adam. We observe that Adam can enter a state in which the parameter update vector has a relatively large norm and is essentially uncorrelated with the direction of descent on the training loss landscape, leading to divergence. This artifact is more likely to be observed in the training of a deep model with a large batch size, which is the typical setting of large-scale language model training. To argue the theory, we present observations from the training runs of the language models of different scales: 7 billion, 30 billion, 65 billion, and 546 billion parameters.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning cs.AIArtificial Intelligence math.OCOptimization and Control

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Jul 2023 to Jul 2023. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.