<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Provably-Efficient and Internally-Deterministic Parallel Union-Find · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2304.09331/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2304.09331/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Provably-Efficient and Internally-Deterministic Parallel Union-Find — mentioned by foota</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37829948</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2304.09331:37829948</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 09:09:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This left me wondering if there might be a deterministic parallel algorithm for union find :) I did find this arxiv paper from April which claims to have one: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09331 My understanding is that they process batches of edges at a time. If they &amp;quot;conflict&amp;quot; (meaning they want to do different things to the data structure) then they&amp;#x27;re processed in serial, otherwise all edges in the batch are handled sequentially. They provide a bound on how often edges should conflict, and use that to show the complexity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2304.09331/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DS</category></item></channel></rss>
