HackerPapers

arXiv:2304.02210cs.CL

Document-Level Machine Translation with Large Language Models

Longyue Wang, Chenyang Lyu, Tianbo Ji, Zhirui Zhang, Dian Yu, Shuming Shi, Zhaopeng Tu

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT can produce coherent, cohesive, relevant, and fluent answers for various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Taking document-level machine translation (MT) as a testbed, this paper provides an in-depth evaluation of LLMs' ability on discourse modeling. The study focuses on three aspects: 1) Effects of Context-Aware Prompts, where we investigate the impact of different prompts on document-level translation quality and discourse phenomena; 2) Comparison of Translation Models, where we compare the translation performance of ChatGPT with commercial MT systems and advanced document-level MT methods; 3) Analysis of Discourse Modelling Abilities, where we further probe discourse knowledge encoded in LLMs and shed light on impacts of training techniques on discourse modeling. By evaluating on a number of benchmarks, we surprisingly find that LLMs have demonstrated superior performance and show potential to become a new paradigm for document-level translation: 1) leveraging their powerful long-text modeling capabilities, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 outperform commercial MT systems in terms of human evaluation; 2) GPT-4 demonstrates a stronger ability for probing linguistic knowledge than GPT-3.5. This work highlights the challenges and opportunities of LLMs for MT, which we hope can inspire the future design and evaluation of LLMs.We release our data and annotations at https://github.com/longyuewangdcu/Document-MT-LLM.

arXiv comments
Longyue Wang, Chenyang Lyu, Tianbo Ji, Zhirui Zhang are equal contributors
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Sep 2023 to Jan 2024.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • It's not just cartels, but also self-citations. For example, the original preprint of this paper [1] has 5 self-citations, with the version accepted to EMNLP increasing that to 10. This kind of behavior is sadly pretty common now and when you mention it to conference organizers…

      nsagentView on HNParent context

    • >It's not under the radar because that's sadly not the case It is the case. Haven't seen anyone who uses both who thinks otherwise. also https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13294. This benchmarks 3.5 which is quite a bit worse than 4 as it is against Google, NLLB, Deepl here…

      famouswafflesView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.