A computation of the ninth Dedekind Number — mentioned by vlovich123

Tue, 27 Jun 2023 14:59:51 GMT

> The problem: The calculation of these terms on normal processors is slow and also the use of GPUs as currently the fastest hardware accelerator technology for many AI applications is not efficient for this algorithm. > https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.03039.pdf At this rate, a single FPGA processes about 5.2 α values per second, taking 47’000 FPGA hours to compute D(9) and > https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.00895.pdf The only thing left to say is that we run the algorithm on Nvidia A100 GPUs. 5311 GPU hours and 4257682565 matrix multiplications later, we got the following value for the ninth Dedekind…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

A computation of the ninth Dedekind Number — mentioned by jayhoon

Tue, 27 Jun 2023 12:35:01 GMT

Interestingly, the same result has been achieved by a single person, Christian Jäkel of TU Dresden: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.00895

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

A computation of the ninth Dedekind Number · HackerPapers discussions

A computation of the ninth Dedekind Number — mentioned by vlovich123

A computation of the ninth Dedekind Number — mentioned by jayhoon