Humans in Humans Out: On GPT Converging Toward Common Sense in both Success and Failure · HackerPapers discussions

Humans in Humans Out: On GPT Converging Toward Common Sense in both Success and Failure — mentioned by famouswaffles

Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:36:57 GMT

No it's not. You imagine it to be meaningful but it really isn't. There's no proof of consciousness to be had. I can't prove you are concious. I just assume so. Because it's practical I do, amongst other things. You are going to end up treating these embodied autonomous agents like conscious beings because the effects could be disastrous otherwise, just as they would with other people. It amazes me how humanity can be so shortsighted with so much history to fall back on. The only reason Bing isn't potentially dangerous or adversarial to the user is because of its limited sets of actions.…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Humans in Humans Out: On GPT Converging Toward Common Sense in both Success and Failure — HN submission

Sat, 08 Apr 2023 13:03:32 GMT

Humans in Humans Out: GPT Converging Toward Common Sense in Both Success/Failure

60 points; 94 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Humans in Humans Out: On GPT Converging Toward Common Sense in both Success and Failure — HN submission

Sat, 08 Apr 2023 04:22:43 GMT

Humans in Humans Out: GPT Converging Toward Common Sense in Success and Failure

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.