<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>FineIBT: Fine-grain Control-flow Enforcement with Indirect Branch Tracking · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.16353/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.16353/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>FineIBT: Fine-grain Control-flow Enforcement with Indirect Branch Tracking — mentioned by ashvardanian</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37850670</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2303.16353:37850670</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 21:47:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It depends on the solution. The paper referenced in the article suggests &amp;quot;≈ 0%-1.94% in SPEC CPU2017 and ≈0%-1.92% in real-world applications&amp;quot;..., which is extremely impressive. In my practice, the costs are generally much higher. paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.16353&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.16353/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
