<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Is there a Moore's law for quantum computing? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.15547/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.15547/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Is there a Moore's law for quantum computing? — mentioned by brohee</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46077507</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2303.15547:46077507</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 10:56:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;And no clear quantum Moore law emerging for the yearly increase in qbits (https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.15547)... The quantum panic pushes people to deploy immature solutions, and the remedy sure sometimes looks worse than the illness...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.15547/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
