HackerPapers

arXiv:2303.15514astro-ph.GA

Abell 1201: Detection of an Ultramassive Black Hole in a Strong Gravitational Lens

James. W. Nightingale, Russell J. Smith, Qiuhan He, Conor M. O'Riordan, Jacob A. Kegerreis, Aristeidis Amvrosiadis, Alastair C. Edge, Amy Etherington, Richard G. Hayes, Ash Kelly, John R. Lucey, Richard J. Massey Richard J. Massey

Abstract

Supermassive black holes (SMBHs) are a key catalyst of galaxy formation and evolution, leading to an observed correlation between SMBH mass $M_{\rm BH}$ and host galaxy velocity dispersion $σ_{\rm e}$. Outside the local Universe, measurements of $M_{\rm BH}$ are usually only possible for SMBHs in an active state: limiting sample size and introducing selection biases. Gravitational lensing makes it possible to measure the mass of non-active SMBHs. We present models of the $z=0.169$ galaxy-scale strong lens Abell~1201. A cD galaxy in a galaxy cluster, it has sufficient `external shear' that a magnified image of a $z = 0.451$ background galaxy is projected just $\sim 1$ kpc from the galaxy centre. Using multi-band Hubble Space Telescope imaging and the lens modeling software $\texttt{PyAutoLens}$ we reconstruct the distribution of mass along this line of sight. Bayesian model comparison favours a point mass with $M_{\rm BH} = 3.27 \pm 2.12\times10^{10}\,$M$_{\rm \odot}$ (3$σ$ confidence limit); an ultramassive black hole. One model gives a comparable Bayesian evidence without a SMBH, however we argue this model is nonphysical given its base assumptions. This model still provides an upper limit of $M_{\rm BH} \leq 5.3 \times 10^{10}\,$M$_{\rm \odot}$, because a SMBH above this mass deforms the lensed image $\sim 1$ kpc from Abell 1201's centre. This builds on previous work using central images to place upper limits on $M_{\rm BH}$, but is the first to also place a lower limit and without a central image being observed. The success of this method suggests that surveys during the next decade could measure thousands more SMBH masses, and any redshift evolution of the $M_{\rm BH}$--$σ_{\rm e}$ relation. Results are available at https://github.com/Jammy2211/autolens_abell_1201.

arXiv comments
Accepted in MNRAS, 27 pages, 22 figures
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.1093/mnras/stad587
Subjects
astro-ph.GAAstrophysics of Galaxies astro-ph.COCosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics astro-ph.IMInstrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics gr-qcGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 4 comments across 1 thread, from Mar 2023 to Mar 2023.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • edit the bbc article got it wrong withe 30 billion times the size and it supposed to be 30 billion solar masses see [1] or the arxiv article [2] The bbc article says 30 billion times the size while TON618 is 66 billion times the mass. Wikipedia says TON618 has a Schwarzschild…

      davorakView on HNParent context

    • I mean...There are others bigger than that with Phoenix A, but these are quasars and very visible, even if billions of LY away. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Cluster#Supermassive_b... It seems the bigger tact is HOW it was discovered using gravitational lensing that may…

      croutonwagonView on HNParent context

    • Here is a copy of the paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.15514.pdf

      croutonwagonView on HNParent context

    • The 30 billion times the size of the sun is BBC making a mistake. It is 30 billion solar masses. Direct from durham [1] from the arxiv article [2]. techwiz137 pointed out[3] an existing known black hole, TON618, is 66 billion solar masses[4]. So the new find is large but not the…

      davorakView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.