<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Artificial muses: Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Have Risen to Human-Level Creativity · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.12003/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.12003/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Artificial muses: Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Have Risen to Human-Level Creativity — mentioned by famouswaffles</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38114201</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2303.12003:38114201</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 14:46:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;1. &amp;quot;I think GPT-3 is artificial general intelligence, AGI. I think GPT-3 is as intelligent as a human. And I think that it is probably more intelligent than a human in a restricted way… in many ways it is more purely intelligent than humans are. I think humans are approximating what GPT-3 is doing, not vice versa.” — Connor Leahy, co-founder of EleutherAI, creator of GPT-J (November 2020) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrV19SjKUss&amp;amp;t=175s 2. https://www.noemamag.com/artificial-general-intelligence-is-... 3. Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.12003/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Artificial muses: Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Have Risen to Human-Level Creativity — mentioned by famouswaffles</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36498164</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2303.12003:36498164</guid><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2023 20:23:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes you&amp;#x27;ll find that any testable definition of AGI that has not been passed yet would be unpassable for a big chunk of the human population. In other words, General, Artificial and Intelligent have been passed. That&amp;#x27;s why a few papers/researchers opt to call these models &amp;quot;General Artificial Intelligence&amp;quot; instead https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/28064... https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12003 Or some such variant like &amp;quot;General Purpose Technologies&amp;quot; as Open AI did. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10130 since &amp;quot;AGI&amp;quot; has so much baggage with posts shifting at the speed of light.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.12003/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Artificial muses: Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Have Risen to Human-Level Creativity — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35288381</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2303.12003:35288381</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 12:53:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Have Risen to Human-Level Creativity&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.12003/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
