<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>SPDF: Sparse Pre-training and Dense Fine-tuning for Large Language Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.10464/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.10464/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>SPDF: Sparse Pre-training and Dense Fine-tuning for Large Language Models — mentioned by boomerang90</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35347787</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2303.10464:35347787</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 21:02:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree fine-tuning for task will give better results. Cerebras actually showed some research recently on this front. Sparse pre-training and dense fine-tuning (https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10464). You can recover the accuracy of sparse pre-trained models with dense fine-tuning and reduce FLOPs of the end-to-end pipeline by 2.5x compared to dense.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.10464/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
