<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplication · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.09540/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.09540/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplication — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45624042</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2303.09540:45624042</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 01:24:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe given our different niches we interact with different people? But I&amp;#x27;m uncertain because I believe what I&amp;#x27;m saying is highly visible. I forgot, which NeurIPS(?) conference were so many wearing &amp;quot;Scale is all you need&amp;quot; shirts? &amp;gt; My first impression there is that the toolbox has essentially run dry and we need something more to advance the field This is my impression too. Empirical evidence is a great tool and useful, especially when there is no strong theory to provide direction, but it is limited. &amp;gt; My second impression is that empirical researchers in LLMs are mostly junior and…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.09540/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplication — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40901103</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2303.09540:40901103</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2024 22:42:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you&amp;#x27;re close enough that the differences probably aren&amp;#x27;t too important. But if you want a bit more nuance, then read on. For disclosure, I&amp;#x27;m in the second camp here. But I&amp;#x27;ll also say that I have a lot of very strong evidence to support this position, and that I do this from the perspective of a researcher. There&amp;#x27;s a few big problems when making any definite claims about either side. First, we need to know what data the machine is processing when training. I think we all understand that if the data is in training, then testing is not actually testing a model&amp;#x27;s ability to generalize…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.09540/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplication — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39278507</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2303.09540:39278507</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 18:39:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know how much spoilage are in these datasets? Common crawl has a lot of websites in it, including Reddit and Stack*. I&amp;#x27;m certain there are lots of questions in those datasets and we want to differentiate recall from problem solving (often confused). I have a deep distrust when using large datasets like this given a common one with 60 authors assumed writing leet code style programs by hand would mean they wouldn&amp;#x27;t appear in the training data (github) and didn&amp;#x27;t even bother to check. It&amp;#x27;s really hard to sanitize datasets of this size and deduplication is a much harder task than…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.09540/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplication — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36926810</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2303.09540:36926810</guid><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2023 01:34:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;For this case, yes. In the general sense, no. That&amp;#x27;s what I&amp;#x27;m saying. And to be clear, this is actually a common problem, not an uncommon one. Here&amp;#x27;s a bit more why. In general, can you tell me how I can identify duplicates in my dataset? Ken&amp;#x27;s methods only work under certain assumptions. The Filipino test only works because there is an exact match. It would not work if one was a subset of the other. Kinnews does a bit better, but also assumes precise matches. It&amp;#x27;s also important to remember that these are not very large datasets. Filipino is &amp;lt;1Mb and Kinnews is ~5M (the one used). MNIST is…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.09540/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplication — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36039193</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2303.09540:36039193</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 02:45:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I don&amp;#x27;t think you took more than a passing glance, if any at those papers. I&amp;#x27;ll assume in good faith but let&amp;#x27;s try to keep this in mind both ways. &amp;gt; What you describe is impossible with these 3. Definitely possible. I did not write my comment as a paper but I did provide plenty of evidence. I specifically ask that you pay close attention to my HumanEval comment and click that link. I am much more specific about how a &amp;quot;novel&amp;quot; dataset may not actually be novel. This is a complicated topic and we must connect many dots. So care is needed. You have no reason to trust my claim that I am an ML…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.09540/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplication — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35191667</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2303.09540:35191667</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 01:35:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplication&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.09540/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
