<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>An exponential improvement for diagonal Ramsey · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.09521/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.09521/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>An exponential improvement for diagonal Ramsey — mentioned by OJFord</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38602601</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2303.09521:38602601</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 17:33:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought it was entertainingly specific, and fortunately the abstract at least [0] was slightly less immediately beyond me than I feared, to satisfy my curiosity a bit: The main proof is an improvement to the 4^k bound (standing since 1935) to (4-eps)^k for some epsilon. They additionally prove (I guess they have properties that make it slightly easier than other rounder/bigger numbers?) it for eps=2^-10 and eps=2^-7 specifically. (3.993 then comes from the latter, 4 minus it gives 3.9921 and change, but of course you need to round that up to 3.993 in order to say it&amp;#x27;s a bound: it&amp;#x27;s not…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.09521/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CO</category></item><item><title>An exponential improvement for diagonal Ramsey — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35496308</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2303.09521:35496308</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2023 18:43:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;An exponential improvement for diagonal Ramsey (numbers)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.09521/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CO</category></item><item><title>An exponential improvement for diagonal Ramsey — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35194772</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2303.09521:35194772</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 09:05:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;An exponential improvement for diagonal Ramsey&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 2 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2303.09521/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
