<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>EEG2IMAGE: Image Reconstruction from EEG Brain Signals · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2302.10121/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2302.10121/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>EEG2IMAGE: Image Reconstruction from EEG Brain Signals — mentioned by 13years</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35024057</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2302.10121:35024057</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2023 20:12:29 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;That discussion yielded interesting debate and I would conclude the results as being inconclusive at present. Also yielded other projects doing similar work. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.10121&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2302.10121/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.HC</category></item><item><title>EEG2IMAGE: Image Reconstruction from EEG Brain Signals — mentioned by dr_dshiv</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35020133</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2302.10121:35020133</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2023 11:41:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;My colleagues did the same, but with EEG. This makes the technique much more accessible: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.10121 One open question in the field: how to assess the alignment of the AI outcomes across different methods?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2302.10121/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.HC</category></item></channel></rss>
