<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How Effective is Multiple-Vantage-Point Domain Control Validation? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2302.08000/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2302.08000/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>How Effective is Multiple-Vantage-Point Domain Control Validation? — mentioned by btown</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38577851</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2302.08000:38577851</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2023 02:29:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#x27;s Encrypt does validate via multiple streams: https://letsencrypt.org/2020/02/19/multi-perspective-validat... But even this is vulnerable if a strong adversary can make it seem like their compromised nameserver is the only reliable nameserver reachable over the network: https://i.blackhat.com/USA21/Wednesday-Handouts/US-21-Shulma... An analysis from early 2023 indicates LE&amp;#x27;s default setup was suboptimal compared to a multi-cloud quorum policy, which seems like a no-brainer at their scale IMHO: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.08000&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2302.08000/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
