Comment on "Traversable wormhole dynamics on a quantum processor" — mentioned by godelski

Wed, 27 Nov 2024 02:53:24 GMT

Unfortunately I have not found this to be true (though it is in this case). There are quite a number of articles that are misleading or flat out false. The best example is the quantum wormhole article and video[0,1], because it is egregious and doesn't take much nuance or expertise see the issues. I'm glad they made a note and wrote a follow-up[2], but all this illustrates what is wrong with the picture. For one, the article and video were published the same day as it was published in Nature[3]. Sure, they are getting wind of the preprints, but in this case there was none! They're often…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Comment on "Traversable wormhole dynamics on a quantum processor" — HN submission

Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:26:50 GMT

Comment on “Traversable wormhole dynamics on a quantum processor”

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Comment on "Traversable wormhole dynamics on a quantum processor" · HackerPapers discussions

Comment on "Traversable wormhole dynamics on a quantum processor" — mentioned by godelski

Comment on "Traversable wormhole dynamics on a quantum processor" — HN submission