arXiv:2301.13302cs.HC
A Study of Editor Features in a Creative Coding Classroom
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
Creative coding is a rapidly expanding domain for both artistic expression and computational education. Numerous libraries and IDEs support creative coding, however there has been little consideration of how the environments themselves might be designed to serve these twin goals. To investigate this gap, we implemented and used an experimental editor to teach a sequence of college and high-school creative coding courses. In the first year, we conducted a log analysis of student work (n=39) and surveys regarding prospective features (n=25). These guided our implementation of common enhancements (e.g. color pickers) as well as uncommon ones (e.g. bidirectional shape editing). In the second year, we studied the effects of these features through logging (n=39+) and survey (n=23) studies. Reflecting on the results, we identify opportunities to improve creativity- and novice-focused IDEs and highlight tensions in their design -- as in tools that augment artistry or efficiency but may be perceived as hindering learning.
Can't believe you didn't mention Minart! ;-) (https://github.com/JD557/minart) The live coding experience is something where I think a lot more work could be done. This paper by Ravi Chugh et al, and a lot of his other work, points to interesting directions to take…
noelwelshView on HNParent context