HackerPapers

arXiv:2301.12633cs.SE

Faster or Slower? Performance Mystery of Python Idioms Unveiled with Empirical Evidence

Zejun Zhang, Zhenchang Xing, Xin Xia, Xiwei Xu, Liming Zhu, Qinghua Lu

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The usage of Python idioms is popular among Python developers in a formative study of 101 performance-related questions of Python idioms on Stack Overflow, we find that developers often get confused about the performance impact of Python idioms and use anecdotal toy code or rely on personal project experience which is often contradictory in performance outcomes. There has been no large-scale, systematic empirical evidence to reconcile these performance debates. In the paper, we create a large synthetic dataset with 24,126 pairs of non-idiomatic and functionally-equivalent idiomatic code for the nine unique Python idioms identified in Zhang et al., and reuse a large real-project dataset of 54,879 such code pairs provided by Zhang et al. We develop a reliable performance measurement method to compare the speedup or slowdown by idiomatic code against non-idiomatic counterpart, and analyze the performance discrepancies between the synthetic and real-project code, the relationships between code features and performance changes, and the root causes of performance changes at the bytecode level. We summarize our findings as some actionable suggestions for using Python idioms.

arXiv comments
12 pages, accepted to ICSE'2023
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.SESoftware Engineering

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 2 HN submissions from Feb 2023 to Feb 2023. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.