<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>StyleGAN-T: Unlocking the Power of GANs for Fast Large-Scale Text-to-Image Synthesis · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2301.09515/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2301.09515/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>StyleGAN-T: Unlocking the Power of GANs for Fast Large-Scale Text-to-Image Synthesis — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38648783</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2301.09515:38648783</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 23:17:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, I left too much knowledge for inference. I presumed it was safe to let users infer that a 2018 (StyleGAN) or 2019 (StyleGAN2) model was not going to compete with performance of a 2023 model, regardless of architecture. There has in fact been improvements in GANs in the last 5 years. Text conditioning is not unique to diffusion and is rather a subnetwork for conditioning (actually StyleGAN&amp;#x27;s whole innovation was creating a subnetwork for conditioning synthesis) There are definitely modern GANs that are T2I and computationally cheaper than a latent diffusion model for a comparable…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2301.09515/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>StyleGAN-T: Unlocking the Power of GANs for Fast Large-Scale Text-to-Image Synthesis — mentioned by cubefox</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36310021</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2301.09515:36310021</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 13:35:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought for fast text-to-image synthesizer you would need a GAN instead of a diffusion model. GAN models are much faster. Though apparently they aren&amp;#x27;t quite competitive with diffusion models in terms of quality. See https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.09515&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2301.09515/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>StyleGAN-T: Unlocking the Power of GANs for Fast Large-Scale Text-to-Image Synthesis — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34500886</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2301.09515:34500886</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 08:13:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;StyleGAN-T: Unlocking the Power of GANs for Fast Large-Scale Text-to-Image&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2301.09515/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
