<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Engine · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2301.08745/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2301.08745/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Engine — mentioned by waboremo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35868897</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2301.08745:35868897</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2023 00:44:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;No, not fully. ChatGPT and Google Translate/DeepL are about equal. This is for a couple reasons: machine translations are very good these days, and ChatGPT struggles with domain specific translations (whereas these commercial products have incentive to improve within). It&amp;#x27;s marginally better at sounding natural with translations though. &amp;quot;In fact, the frequent use of soap is bad for the skin.&amp;quot; (chatgpt) vs &amp;quot;In fact, using soap too often is bad for your skin.&amp;quot; (google)[1] [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.08745&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2301.08745/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
