<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Evolutionary Computation Methods No One Should Use · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2301.01984/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2301.01984/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Evolutionary Computation Methods No One Should Use — mentioned by muldvarp</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39188747</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2301.01984:39188747</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:16:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The entire field of metaheuristics is in dire need of a shakeup. Many of the newer publications are not actually novel [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5], the metaphors used to describe these methods only disguise their inner workings and similarities and differences to existing approaches and shouldn&amp;#x27;t justify their publication [6, 7]. The set of benchmarks used to verify the excellent performance of these methods is small and biased [8, 9]. The metaphors don&amp;#x27;t match the given algorithms [10], the given algorithms don&amp;#x27;t match the implementation [11] and the results don&amp;#x27;t match the implementation [12]. It&amp;#x27;s…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2301.01984/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.NE</category></item></channel></rss>
