HackerPapers

arXiv:2212.13894cs.AI

LAMBADA: Backward Chaining for Automated Reasoning in Natural Language

Mehran Kazemi, Najoung Kim, Deepti Bhatia, Xin Xu, Deepak Ramachandran

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Remarkable progress has been made on automated reasoning with natural text, by using Language Models (LMs) and methods such as Chain-of-Thought and Selection-Inference. These techniques search for proofs in the forward direction from axioms to the conclusion, which suffers from a combinatorial explosion of the search space, and thus high failure rates for problems requiring longer chains of reasoning. The classical automated reasoning literature has shown that reasoning in the backward direction (i.e. from the intended conclusion to supporting axioms) is significantly more efficient at proof-finding. Importing this intuition into the LM setting, we develop a Backward Chaining algorithm, called LAMBADA, that decomposes reasoning into four sub-modules. These sub-modules are simply implemented by few-shot prompted LM inference. We show that LAMBADA achieves sizable accuracy boosts over state-of-the-art forward reasoning methods on challenging logical reasoning datasets, particularly when deep and accurate proof chains are required.

arXiv comments
Accepted at ACL 2023
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Jan 2023 to Jan 2023.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • It seems like an article from Kodak or Nokia. It's only a matter of time, and it will be sooner rather than later, that multimodal LLMs will replace search engines. All of the problems mentioned in the article are being addressed as we speak. Advanced retrieval transformer +…

      lossoloView on HNParent context

    • COT is so yesterday! SOTA is LAMBADA[1] aka backward chaining also from Google, that significantly outperforms chain of thought and select inference in terms of prediction accuracy and proof accuracy. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.13894

      lossoloView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.