HackerPapers

arXiv:2212.11279cs.NE

Annotated History of Modern AI and Deep Learning

Juergen Schmidhuber

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is the science of credit assignment. It seeks to find patterns in observations that explain and predict the consequences of events and actions. This then helps to improve future performance. Minsky's so-called "fundamental credit assignment problem" (1963) surfaces in all sciences including physics (why is the world the way it is?) and history (which persons/ideas/actions have shaped society and civilisation?). Here I focus on the history of ML itself. Modern artificial intelligence (AI) is dominated by artificial neural networks (NNs) and deep learning, both of which are conceptually closer to the old field of cybernetics than what was traditionally called AI (e.g., expert systems and logic programming). A modern history of AI & ML must emphasize breakthroughs outside the scope of shallow AI text books. In particular, it must cover the mathematical foundations of today's NNs such as the chain rule (1676), the first NNs (circa 1800), the first practical AI (1914), the theory of AI and its limitations (1931-34), and the first working deep learning algorithms (1965-). From the perspective of 2025, I provide a timeline of the most significant events in the history of NNs, ML, deep learning, AI, computer science, and mathematics in general, crediting the individuals who laid the field's foundations. The text contains numerous hyperlinks to relevant overview sites. With a ten-year delay, it supplements my 2015 award-winning deep learning survey which provides hundreds of additional references. Finally, I will put things in a broader historical context, spanning from the Big Bang to when the universe will be many times older than it is now.

arXiv comments
97 pages, over 600 references. 2022 arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2005.05744
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.NENeural and Evolutionary Computing

On Hacker News

Linked by 4 identifiable commenters in 5 comments across 5 threads, from Apr 2023 to Apr 2025. Found in 3 HN submissions from Dec 2022 to Jun 2023. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments5 threads

    • Interesting, but... starting in 2022? That's not an "AI Timeline", that's an "LLM Timeline" or maybe a "Generative AI Timeline". But AI proper goes back much, much further. At least to Dartmouth in 1956[1] and if you accept some of Jurgen Schmidhuber's reasoning[2] then back to…

      mindcrimeView on HNParent context

    • > but it would be impractical to make it book-sized Not really: History: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.11279 (75 pp.) Survey: https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.7828 (88 pp.) Conveniently skim-read over the course of the four weekends on one month.

      jll29View on HNParent context

    • For some unknown reason both PDF links https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.11279 https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2212/2212.11279.pdf get automatically replaced (it's not redirection) with the abstract webpage upon submission. The references section, along with some footnotes, take up…

      antegamisouView on HNParent context

  1. Why did Google Brain exist? 1 comment
    • You're lucky you could push a fix before Schmidhuber [1] noticed! ;) [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.11279

      jll29View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.