Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey · HackerPapers discussions

Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey — HN submission

Sat, 14 Dec 2024 16:50:49 GMT

Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey (2023)

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey — mentioned by vannevar

Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:15:54 GMT

The innovation test they use relies heavily on reasoning, something that the stock LLMs tested are known to be deficient in. Adding reasoning to large language models is an active research area (see e.g. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10403). Link to actual paper FTA: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17456916231201401

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey — mentioned by soraki_soladead

Sun, 19 Mar 2023 20:27:45 GMT

Sure. A few below but far from exhaustive: - https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.07528 - https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10403 - https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903 - https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.13382 There are also literally hundreds of articles and tweet threads about it. Moreover, as I said, you can test many of my claims above directly using readily available LLMs. GP has a much harder defense. They have to prove that despite all of these capabilities that LLMs are not intelligent. That the mechanisms by which humans possess intelligence is fundamentally distinct from a computer’s ability to exhibit the…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.