<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Explicit zero-free regions for the Riemann zeta-function · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2212.06867/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2212.06867/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Explicit zero-free regions for the Riemann zeta-function — mentioned by gavagai691</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40579079</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2212.06867:40579079</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 21:22:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;It has been proved all the zeroes are within a narrow strip centred on the line and you can make the strip as arbitrarily narrow as you like.&amp;quot; Nothing close to this is known. The nontrivial zeros of zeta lie within the critical strip, i.e., 0 &amp;lt;= Re(s) &amp;lt;= 1 (in analytic number theory, the convention, going back to Riemann&amp;#x27;s paper is to write a complex variable as s = sigma + it)*. The Riemann Hypothesis states that all zeros of zeta are on the line Re(s) = 1/2. The functional equation implies that the zeros of zeta are symmetric about the line Re(s) = 1/2. Consequently, RH is equivalent to…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2212.06867/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item></channel></rss>
