<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A strong He II $λ$1640 emitter with extremely blue UV spectral slope at $z=8.16$: presence of Pop III stars? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2212.04476/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2212.04476/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A strong He II $λ$1640 emitter with extremely blue UV spectral slope at $z=8.16$: presence of Pop III stars? — mentioned by perihelions</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34584289</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2212.04476:34584289</guid><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2023 18:34:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Am I blind or does the paper not mention helium-2 at all? https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.04476 It talks extensively about &amp;quot;He II&amp;quot;, the astrophysics notation for singly-ionized helium (a helium atom with one electron removed; He+). That isn&amp;#x27;t notation for a helium isotope. I can&amp;#x27;t see anything in the paper mentioning isotopes, nuclear reactions, or anything in that direction. (?)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2212.04476/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item></channel></rss>
