<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>CLIP: Train Faster with Less Data · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2212.01452/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2212.01452/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>CLIP: Train Faster with Less Data — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38340378</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2212.01452:38340378</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 00:27:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#x27;m half kidding, I get what you mean I mean yeah, I&amp;#x27;m not saying that they shouldn&amp;#x27;t be able to use the name. There&amp;#x27;s no control of &amp;quot;StyleX&amp;quot; but it certainly is a poor choice that can lead to confusion. That&amp;#x27;s all I&amp;#x27;m getting at. 100% this is an opinion (would be insane if believed to be anything else). I don&amp;#x27;t think it is just a &amp;quot;sub-field&amp;quot; as you mention and it definitely isn&amp;#x27;t like StyleGAN isn&amp;#x27;t known by nearly every person that learns ML (I have seen very few courses that do not mention it, but those tend to be ones that don&amp;#x27;t discuss generation at all). StyleGAN is one of the most…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2212.01452/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
