<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Unidentified aerial phenomena II. Evaluation of UAP properties · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2211.17085/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2211.17085/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Unidentified aerial phenomena II. Evaluation of UAP properties — mentioned by likeabbas</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34672798</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2211.17085:34672798</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 03:05:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is a recent paper by Ukrainian astronomers about UAP caught by their two major telescopes going Mach 15+ and doing an instantaneous u turn https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.17085 Most likely other astronomers have picked up events like this but discarded the data since it wasn’t matching what they were looking for, or the stigma pressured them to ignore it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2211.17085/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.pop-ph</category></item><item><title>Unidentified aerial phenomena II. Evaluation of UAP properties — mentioned by likeabbas</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34671026</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2211.17085:34671026</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2023 23:32:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I would not be so adamant about this if the quality of the individuals telling us the government has significant classified data that shows the ET hypothesis best fits what the pilots are seeing. You are the one being unreasonable and not listening to these individuals. Pilots are not the only ones seeing this. Ukrainian astronomers have data from their telescopes in two different cities referencing the same objects traveling at Mach 15, stopping on a dime, then turning around immediately https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.17085 As for the negative mass comment, here&amp;#x27;s a patent by the navy for an…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2211.17085/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.pop-ph</category></item><item><title>Unidentified aerial phenomena II. Evaluation of UAP properties — mentioned by likeabbas</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34666962</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2211.17085:34666962</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2023 17:50:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I really wish people would take a look at the extensive analysis some scientists have done to show the 3 navy videos of UAP are showing flight characteristics that defy our laws of physics. This guy on Twitter has done a fantastic job to show the GIMBAL object performed what we can only describe as a “vertical u-turn” https://twitter.com/the_cholla/status/1504855791060148224?s=... This paper shows the tic tac video exhibited instantaneous acceleration to over 20,000 mph https://www.explorescu.org/post/2004-uss-nimitz-strike-navy-... Here is a paper from the National Aeronautical Observatory…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2211.17085/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.pop-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
