HackerPapers

arXiv:2211.13609cs.LG

PAC-Bayes Compression Bounds So Tight That They Can Explain Generalization

Sanae Lotfi, Marc Finzi, Sanyam Kapoor, Andres Potapczynski, Micah Goldblum, Andrew Gordon Wilson

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

While there has been progress in developing non-vacuous generalization bounds for deep neural networks, these bounds tend to be uninformative about why deep learning works. In this paper, we develop a compression approach based on quantizing neural network parameters in a linear subspace, profoundly improving on previous results to provide state-of-the-art generalization bounds on a variety of tasks, including transfer learning. We use these tight bounds to better understand the role of model size, equivariance, and the implicit biases of optimization, for generalization in deep learning. Notably, we find large models can be compressed to a much greater extent than previously known, encapsulating Occam's razor. We also argue for data-independent bounds in explaining generalization.

arXiv comments
NeurIPS 2022. Code is available at https://github.com/activatedgeek/tight-pac-bayes
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Aug 2025 to Aug 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Are you asking about open problems? Here are a couple: There are strong arguments that deep learning generalization (and robustness in a slightly different sense) can be successfully explained in terms of PAC-Bayes theory, for example: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02113 This…

      hodgehog11View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.