<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A constant lower bound for the union-closed sets conjecture · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2211.09055/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2211.09055/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A constant lower bound for the union-closed sets conjecture — mentioned by thomasahle</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34238095</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2211.09055:34238095</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 21:09:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Paper link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09055 Abstract: We show that for any union-closed family F\subseeq 2^[n],F≠{∅}, there exists an i∈[n] which is contained in a 0.01 fraction of the sets in F. This is the first known constant lower bound, and improves upon the Ω(log_2(|F|)^{−1}) bounds of Knill and Wójick. Our result follows from an information theoretic strengthening of the conjecture. Specifically, we show that if A,B are independent samples from a distribution over subsets of [n] such that Pr[i∈A]&amp;lt;0.01 for all i and H(A)&amp;gt;0, then H(A∪B)&amp;gt;H(A).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2211.09055/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CO</category></item><item><title>A constant lower bound for the union-closed sets conjecture — mentioned by sischoel</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33669055</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2211.09055:33669055</guid><pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 10:53:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;From skimming the paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09055), the proof seems to be amazingly short and relies only on a few theorems that one encounters in introductory class on information theory. Definitely recommendable to read if one is interested in that kind of combinatorics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2211.09055/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
