<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Assessing requirements to scale to practical quantum advantage · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2211.07629/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2211.07629/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Assessing requirements to scale to practical quantum advantage — mentioned by lkm0</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47610749</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2211.07629:47610749</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 06:39:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;To put this in context, we&amp;#x27;ve had a streak of improvements to Shor&amp;#x27;s algorithm that have put the horizon much closer. In 2022, people from Microsoft estimated that it would take more than 10M (physical) qubits to implement factoring. We&amp;#x27;re now standing at a 1000x improvement. It&amp;#x27;s still years away for sure, but who can be unhappy with all that progress? ms paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.07629&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2211.07629/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
