<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Adaptive Analytical Ray Tracing of Black Hole Photon Rings · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2211.07469/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2211.07469/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Adaptive Analytical Ray Tracing of Black Hole Photon Rings — mentioned by lupsasca</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42189560</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2211.07469:42189560</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:22:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;If you put the source infinitely far away (as we are doing here) and at zero velocity relative to the camera, then there is no redshift effect at all, so you could say that this is the choice of redshift that we made :) If you want the details, they&amp;#x27;re too long to put in this comment but essentially what I mean is that the r-&amp;gt;infty limit of the redshift factor in Eq. (B22) of this paper is unity: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.07469&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2211.07469/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
