HackerPapers

arXiv:2210.16859cs.LG

A Solvable Model of Neural Scaling Laws

Alexander Maloney, Daniel A. Roberts, James Sully

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Large language models with a huge number of parameters, when trained on near internet-sized number of tokens, have been empirically shown to obey neural scaling laws: specifically, their performance behaves predictably as a power law in either parameters or dataset size until bottlenecked by the other resource. To understand this better, we first identify the necessary properties allowing such scaling laws to arise and then propose a statistical model -- a joint generative data model and random feature model -- that captures this neural scaling phenomenology. By solving this model in the dual limit of large training set size and large number of parameters, we gain insight into (i) the statistical structure of datasets and tasks that lead to scaling laws, (ii) the way nonlinear feature maps, such as those provided by neural networks, enable scaling laws when trained on these datasets, (iii) the optimality of the equiparameterization scaling of training sets and parameters, and (iv) whether such scaling laws can break down and how they behave when they do. Key findings are the manner in which the power laws that occur in the statistics of natural datasets are extended by nonlinear random feature maps and then translated into power-law scalings of the test loss and how the finite extent of the data's spectral power law causes the model's performance to plateau.

arXiv comments
73 + 23 pages, 14 + 5 figures
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning hep-thHigh Energy Physics, Theory stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics)

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Feb 2026 to Feb 2026.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. The Problem with LLMs 1 comment
    • Fine, that's fair. I believe the statement that you made is countered by my claim, which is: Theorem. For any tolerance epsilon > 0, there exists a transformer neural network of sufficient size that follows, up to the factor epsilon, the policy that most optimally achieves…

      hodgehog11View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.