A stochastic analysis of subcritical Euclidean fermionic field theories · HackerPapers discussionshttps://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.15047/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMTA stochastic analysis of subcritical Euclidean fermionic field theories — mentioned by mgubihttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34183541urn:hackerpapers:mention:2210.15047:34183541Fri, 30 Dec 2022 09:47:18 GMT<p>It is not clear what this comment would like to add. The presupposition that no other software can equal or surpass some magic powers of TeX/LaTeX has nothing to do with technical merit. Indeed I guess most users cannot distinguish a document produced with TeXmacs or with LaTeX. For example all these papers: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.05584.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.05562.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.15047.pdf have been typesetted directly with TeXmacs with no intervention of LaTeX whatsoever. What use cases do you have in mind to support your claim? ps: it is clear that TeX is a…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.15047/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>math.PRA stochastic analysis of subcritical Euclidean fermionic field theories — HN submissionhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33373788urn:hackerpapers:submission:2210.15047:33373788Fri, 28 Oct 2022 16:38:43 GMT<p>Lengthy math paper written using TeXmacs</p><p></p><p>3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.15047/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>math.PR