<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.11416/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.11416/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models — mentioned by famouswaffles</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35868905</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2210.11416:35868905</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2023 00:45:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;OpenAI hasn’t told us why ChatGPT is so much better than other models Here&amp;#x27;s the thing.... It&amp;#x27;s not. Unless you restrict the pool to models you know about. https://crfm.stanford.edu/helm/latest/?group=core_scenarios And Again, chatGPT was not the general SOTA LLM. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11416 So in the research world with detailed papers explaining what and what not, we had models that were better.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.11416/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models — mentioned by famouswaffles</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34958045</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2210.11416:34958045</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:09:54 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;GPT 3.5 is definitely not comparable to Palm. You can see some benchmarks here. https://crfm.stanford.edu/helm/latest/?group=core_scenarios For example, text-davinci-3 is 56.9 on MMLU, Flan-Palm is 75. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11416&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.11416/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models — mentioned by lossolo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33914838</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2210.11416:33914838</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 22:46:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;11B parameters, so I guess it&amp;#x27;s FLAN-T5[1]? combined with retrieval transformer (something like RETRO[2])? 1. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11416 2. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.04426&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.11416/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33871620</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2210.11416:33871620</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 20:41:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.11416/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models — mentioned by espadrine</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33342468</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2210.11416:33342468</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2022 12:08:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;BLOOM[0] is another 176B multilingual open-source model whose weights were published. However, running it locally requires 8 A6000 GPUs. The GPU cost alone is roughly $37K. Also, there is the concern of performance. The Chinchilla[1] paper indicates that most model sizes trained so far received too little token training (or were too big) to reach an optimal performance per energy expenditure. Furthermore, the InstructGPT[2] and more recently Flan[3] papers show that various finetuning techniques achieve significant gains, without which the result is a bit meh. The dark secret of GPT-3 is that…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2210.11416/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
