HackerPapers

arXiv:2210.09338cs.CL

Deep Bidirectional Language-Knowledge Graph Pretraining

Michihiro Yasunaga, Antoine Bosselut, Hongyu Ren, Xikun Zhang, Christopher D Manning, Percy Liang, Jure Leskovec

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Pretraining a language model (LM) on text has been shown to help various downstream NLP tasks. Recent works show that a knowledge graph (KG) can complement text data, offering structured background knowledge that provides a useful scaffold for reasoning. However, these works are not pretrained to learn a deep fusion of the two modalities at scale, limiting the potential to acquire fully joint representations of text and KG. Here we propose DRAGON (Deep Bidirectional Language-Knowledge Graph Pretraining), a self-supervised approach to pretraining a deeply joint language-knowledge foundation model from text and KG at scale. Specifically, our model takes pairs of text segments and relevant KG subgraphs as input and bidirectionally fuses information from both modalities. We pretrain this model by unifying two self-supervised reasoning tasks, masked language modeling and KG link prediction. DRAGON outperforms existing LM and LM+KG models on diverse downstream tasks including question answering across general and biomedical domains, with +5% absolute gain on average. In particular, DRAGON achieves notable performance on complex reasoning about language and knowledge (+10% on questions involving long contexts or multi-step reasoning) and low-resource QA (+8% on OBQA and RiddleSense), and new state-of-the-art results on various BioNLP tasks. Our code and trained models are available at https://github.com/michiyasunaga/dragon.

arXiv comments
Published at NeurIPS 2022. Code, data, and trained models are available at https://github.com/michiyasunaga/dragon
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Dec 2022 to Dec 2022.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Thank you for posting this. I’m not sure why but it seems like very few of the ChatGPT threads I’ve read across on Twitter/HN showing “very accurate and intelligent” results never experiment with ablation which is very important in prompt engineering and when evaluating DL…

      haldujaiView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.